I don't know if counting a Shakespeare play as a book is legit in my quest to 100 books this year...I don't care. I'm counting it and any other Shakespeare play I happen to read, which will be quite a few now that I have the Riverside Shakespeare in Yellowstone. After about ten years I have finally re-read Richard II, not because I heard it was a good play, but because of a historical interest in the time period. I cannot remember one line, or even one part of this play from my first reading so many years ago, which is a truth that holds for the majority of Shakespeare's Histories, the exceptions being Henry V and Richard III.
It wasn't an exceptional play, but it wasn't bad either. King Richard may be the whiniest Shakespeare character of all the plays. He is a simpering, do-nothing, loser who laments that he is unpopular and no one likes him. He is pretty pathetic, and to be regarded as some person who is King, but not in any way to regarded as a divinely ordained king, which brings into question the whole idea the divine right of kings. He is more a laughing stock than a personage of awe. And the audience does not feel sympathy for the king since he also does idiotic acts and brings about his own downfall through stupidity, greed, and the base desire to be flattered. As a character, I liked that he was a fumbling loser, it was interesting. As if King Richard wasn't the only flawed personage, this play makes it difficult at times to really believe some of the things any of the other people say. You believe Richard's crying, which he does a lot of, but I felt that the protagonist, Henry Bullingbrook, at times was lying through his teeth. There really isn't a very honorable character in this play. The nearest is the Duke of York who is willing to send his own son to the gallows in the name of some over-weaning honor and honesty. The players in this tragedy are a pathetic collection of whiners, liars, and idiots. That being the case, I enjoyed it, and the next time I play a role-playing game I think I shall be King Richard for the laughs of it.
Of course it counts! Plays count! With Shakespeare, I'd be counting one play as two books.
ReplyDelete