The Dying Animal, Philip Roth, 156 pages.
I just finished this book no more than a minute ago, so my reactions are fresh and lack any serious thought. having said that, his writing is smooth and read really well. There is not much in there to confuse or confound. It was an engaging book to read, and at times enjoyable. This is my first Philip Roth experience, and I wonder if all of his books are as such.
To begin with I'm not sure what age group or demographic this book is aimed at. It is a confessional of a 70 year old male pervert. Maybe pervert is wrong--maybe an older gentleman that sleeps with his students who are about a third his age on a regular basis. I guess this book is meant to challenge the readers idea of what is acceptable. The narrator is a semi-known aesthetician and criticism teacher who narrates as though he is writing a treatise on love/marriage/freedom. All three go together for him. This does not read as a traditional novel, nor do I think it is supposed to. I feel the narrator is speaking for dual purposes. It is part cathartic and part argument for his lifestyle. It is both persuasive and apologetic. I have very little sympathy for the narrator, but I don't hate him, I just disagree on some points.
I'm not sure I was the age group the book was destined for. Maybe if I was twenty years older I would have found more of myself in the narrator, or not. The sexual exploits of a 70 year old are not things I often ruminate on. I don't regret the book, though I'm not sure it was a useful book for me.
These are my initial reactions. This book also marks a milestone for this year. I am exactly 25% of the way to reading 100 books. Though I am roughly a month behind.
I need to read American Pastoral...it's on my Pulitzer shelf.
ReplyDelete